Difference between revisions of "2024 Energy Storage Summit USA EPRI Resources"

From EPRI Storage Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
=== Fire Prevention and Mitigation for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) ===
=== Fire Prevention and Mitigation for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) ===


{|
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;"
| With a foundational mission to benefit society, EPRI delivers independent, objective thought leadership and industry expertise to the energy sector. EPRI’s portfolio in energy storage includes a collaborative, multi-phase project to understand and close gaps in energy storage safety and subsequent impacts. Our work brings together industry experts to generate new knowledge, identify best practices, and develop a safety toolkit. The research is made publicly available to advance the industry.
|-
! scope="col" colspan="3"| Funding Partners
! scope="col" colspan="2"| Advisory Panel
|-
| Alliant Energy || Excelon  || Southern Company || CAC Specialty || Hiller Fire
|-
| Arizona Public Service || FM Global || Salt River Project || ESRG || Jensen Hughes
|-
| Con Edison || LADWP  || SMUD || Exponent || NREL
|-
| Duke Energy || PG&E || Synergy (Australia) || NFPA || PNNL
|-
| Enel || RES || TVA || Hazard Dynamics || UL
|-
| Eskom (South Africa) || SCE ||  || HSE (UK) || UT Austin
|}
 
With a foundational mission to benefit society, EPRI delivers independent, objective thought leadership and industry expertise to the energy sector. EPRI’s portfolio in energy storage includes a collaborative, multi-phase project to understand and close gaps in energy storage safety and subsequent impacts. Our work brings together industry experts to generate new knowledge, identify best practices, and develop a safety toolkit. The research is made publicly available to advance the industry.


EPRI's [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028531 Battery Energy Storage Fire Prevention and Mitigation] project is in Phase 3. Initiated in 2021, Phase 1 of this project consolidated the experience of 15 utility members, 15 non-utility experts, and 10 energy storage site evaluations to identify gaps in safe design and operations of today’s ESS. Phase 2 created a lifecycle safety toolkit, including a retrofit guide, a codes and standards review, emergency response plan guidelines, and more. Moving forward, EPRI will use prior learnings and a new safety roadmap activity to prioritize and further extend the toolkit resources. Industry insights will be incorporated to guide utility owners, operators, and off-takers in their design, procurement, planning, and incident response.
EPRI's [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028531 Battery Energy Storage Fire Prevention and Mitigation] project is in Phase 3. Initiated in 2021, Phase 1 of this project consolidated the experience of 15 utility members, 15 non-utility experts, and 10 energy storage site evaluations to identify gaps in safe design and operations of today’s ESS. Phase 2 created a lifecycle safety toolkit, including a retrofit guide, a codes and standards review, emergency response plan guidelines, and more. Moving forward, EPRI will use prior learnings and a new safety roadmap activity to prioritize and further extend the toolkit resources. Industry insights will be incorporated to guide utility owners, operators, and off-takers in their design, procurement, planning, and incident response.
| [[File:FPaM.jpg|150px]]
|}


{|
[[File:FPaM_Collab.png|left|190px]] Funding participants include 17 major utilities, project developers and insurance companies across the United States and world. The advisory team consists of diverse stakeholders such as National Labs, Fire Departments, fire safety experts, insurance agencies, and academic institutions.  
|[[File:FPaM_Collab.png|180px]]  
| style="padding: 10px" | Funding participants include 15 major utilities, project developers and insurance companies across the United States and world. The advisory team consists of diverse stakeholders such as National Labs, Fire Departments, fire safety experts, insurance agencies, and academic institutions.  


To explore opportunities for collaboration and provide input in Phase 3 of the project, contact [mailto:Storage-Safety@epri.com Storage-Safety@epri.com].
To explore opportunities for collaboration and provide input in Phase 3 of the project, contact [mailto:Storage-Safety@epri.com Storage-Safety@epri.com].  
|}


=== BESS Failure Event Database ===
[[File:Failure Database 3-15.png|right|380px]]


The [[BESS Failure Event Database|database]] is a public resource documenting battery energy storage failures around the world. It catalogs over 100 incidents in utility and commercial/industrial installations, electric transportation, recycling, manufacturing, and warehousing.


Dependent on the availability of failure event information, database entries include system details, location, a description of the failure event, and links to referenced sources. Reviewing failures of urban installations may provide insights for improved safety and reliability.
=== BESS Failure Event Database ===


To be notified of new entries, contact [mailto:info@example.org Storage-Safety@epri.com].
Reviewing failures of urban installations may provide insights for improved safety and reliability. The [[BESS Failure Event Database|database]] is a public resource for documenting publicly-available data on battery energy storage failure events from around the world. All information included is available in linked public documents that provide information such as system details, location, application, and a description of the failure event. To date, the database catalogs over 100 incidents in utility and commercial/industrial installations, electric transportation, recycling, manufacturing, and warehousing since 2011. EPRI has begun to dive deeper in assessing database statistics around root cause in an effort to measure and track safety and to see what other insights can be gained.


[[File:Failure Database 3-15.png|500px]]
To submit or be notified of new entries, contact [mailto:info@example.org Storage-Safety@epri.com].
[[File:CRS.png|right|200px]]


=== Carnegie Road ESS Failure Response, Recovery, and Rebuild Lessons Learned ===
=== Carnegie Road ESS Failure Response, Recovery, and Rebuild Lessons Learned ===  


{|
In the early morning hours of September 15, 2020, an explosion occurred at the '''Carnegie Road''' energy storage site in the UK, followed by a fire that consumed one of three energy storage enclosures. This [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002026396 report] conveys the '''lessons learned''' from the failure event, including aspects of emergency response, root cause investigation, and the '''redesign''' and '''rebuild''' process. The document conveys the general information about the failure event and the subsequent process to educate the industry and facilitate the development of '''best practices'''. The report highlights the need for clear '''communication''' around design features and failure event details, including the development of a '''post-incident plan'''.
| style="vertical-align:top;" | In the early morning hours of September 15, 2020, an explosion occurred at the '''Carnegie Road''' energy storage site in the UK, followed by a fire that consumed one of three energy storage enclosures. This [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002026396 report] conveys the '''lessons learned''' from the failure event, including aspects of emergency response, root cause investigation, and the '''redesign''' and '''rebuild''' process. The document conveys the general information about the failure event and the subsequent process to educate the industry and facilitate the development of '''best practices'''. The report highlights the need for clear '''communication''' around design features and failure event details, including the development of a '''post-incident plan'''.  
| [[File:CRS.png|120px]]
|}


=== Select Safety Resources ===
=== Select Safety Resources ===
Line 48: Line 57:
|-
|-
| The Evolution of Battery Energy Storage Safety Codes and Standards || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028521 3002028521] || 2023
| The Evolution of Battery Energy Storage Safety Codes and Standards || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028521 3002028521] || 2023
|-
| Technology Innovation Spotlight: Lithium Ion Battery Fires in the News || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028411 3002028411] || 2023
|-
|-
| Safety Implications of Lithium Ion Chemistries || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028522 3002028522] || 2023
| Safety Implications of Lithium Ion Chemistries || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028522 3002028522] || 2023
Line 62: Line 69:
|-
|-
| Lessons Learned: Lithium Ion Battery Storage Fire Prevention and Mitigation—2021 || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002021208 3002021208] || 2021
| Lessons Learned: Lithium Ion Battery Storage Fire Prevention and Mitigation—2021 || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002021208 3002021208] || 2021
|-
| Approaches for Evaluating Potential Human Health Consequences of Utility-Scale Lithium-ion Battery Failures || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002021634 3002021634] || 2021
|-
|-
| Battery Energy Storage Systems Explosion Hazards || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002022706 3002022706] || 2021
| Battery Energy Storage Systems Explosion Hazards || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002022706 3002022706] || 2021
Line 73: Line 78:


Understanding the impacts of energy storage deployment on communities is critical for mitigating community- or public-driven memorandums and project cancellations. EPRI is an industry leader in how to consider and incorporate equity and environmental justice in energy projects. Regarding BESS, specifically, EPRI is developing guidance on community-based considerations that should be included in all phases of the project life cycle.
Understanding the impacts of energy storage deployment on communities is critical for mitigating community- or public-driven memorandums and project cancellations. EPRI is an industry leader in how to consider and incorporate equity and environmental justice in energy projects. Regarding BESS, specifically, EPRI is developing guidance on community-based considerations that should be included in all phases of the project life cycle.
=== Lithium Ion Batteries in the news ===
[[File:TI LIB in the news.png|link=https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028411|left|thumb|260px|text-top|Grid-scale BESS failure rates have decreased due to safety improvements, driven in part by increased regulation.]] A theme throughout EPRI's work understanding the energy storage project impacts on communities and vice versa is the need for effective communication and public education and awareness that provides context for safety, equity, and environmental justice. The industry and regulatory requirements for electric vehicle and stationary energy storage system batteries are much more rigorous than those used in e-mobility devices, such as e-scooters and e-bikes that have caused or contributed to many fires throughout New York City over the past five years, some of which have resulted in death. EPRI did a [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028411 review of grid-scale energy storage deployments and failure rates] and found that large-scale BESS failure rates have decreased substantially since 2018 while cumulative capacity of deployed BESS has grown significantly.
Key takeaways from this study include:
*While lithium ion battery fires have gained media attention, the technology’s overall safety record is
strong and continuously improving.
*The likelihood and severity of fire and explosion associated with lithium ion batteries can be reduced through good design, which is already commonplace in batteries designed for electric vehicle (EV) and grid storage.
*Batteries used in passenger electric vehicles and grid storage are subject to safety certification and testing that substantially reduce the frequency and severity of failures.
*Micro-mobility products have exhibited higher rates of failure and failure intensity, most likely related to less mature quality control implementation, fewer regulatory safety protections, and common use of unapproved aftermarket components.
Large-format batteries used in passenger EVs and grid-scale storage are subject to certification and testing that reduce the frequency and severity of failures. Even with the rapid growth in deployments, failure incidents in these applications are infrequent. Regardless, failures are an avoidable tragedy, and the lessons learned must be applied to further reduce the possibility of future incidents. With proper installation and planning, failures that occur can be managed safely. Lessons learned from events have been applied to new storage facilities and are being integrated into building and fire codes and standards. In contrast, the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission reports suggest micro-mobility products require increased implementation of quality controls and certification to reduce the increasing
frequency of failure incidents. Lithium ion battery safety is an ongoing focus area for research, regulatory development, and continuing education.


=== Community-Based Siting and Permitting for Grid-Scale Lithium Ion Battery Storage ===
=== Community-Based Siting and Permitting for Grid-Scale Lithium Ion Battery Storage ===
As operational and proposed BESS facilities proliferate in the US and other countries, challenges to siting and permitting are emerging due to a combination of factors, some generic and others unique to battery energy storage technology. Large energy infrastructure projects generally face multi-agency reviews and the potential for community-based input and opposition. BESS-specific challenges revolve around the novelty of lithium ion battery technology and its environmental, health, and safety (EH&S) attributes. Of particular concern are the misinterpretation of news reports relating to fire safety and the broad availability of inaccurate and misleading information about observed failure events at utility-scale facilities. These messages are drawing a poor public perception of the technology, slowing energy storage adoption, and could have significantly delay the clean energy transition.
Utilities and energy storage developers need to manage the intersection of distinct developments that are occurring in the technology, market, and regulatory spaces. This can be challenging for understanding how to use energy storage and where to put it to meet electricity needs and ensure safety and environmental responsibility. EPRI has done a review of lithium ion BESS regulatory requirements across the country and is engaged with various energy storage project stakeholders to document their perspectives and experiences with siting and permitting. The intent is to provide insight and context to how energy storage is treated in different jurisdictions and provide guidance to utility planners, project developers, government agencies, jurisdictional authorities, the public, and other stakeholders on leading practices for engaging, communicating, and collaborating with each other to overcome BESS siting and permitting barriers and deliver benefits at the local, regional, national, and global levels.


=== Community Benefit Planning for Energy Storage Projects ===
=== Community Benefit Planning for Energy Storage Projects ===
EPRI is collating its collection of Community Benefits Plans (CBPs) for current and proposed energy storage projects that have been included in applications seeking federal support. CBP development is an opportunity for electric power companies to identify and make explicit the community benefits that projects would provide and include actionable activities within the project plan that improve the standing of communities that have been historically marginalized. The Department of Energy (DOE) requires CBPs to include actions that help to address one or more of the following categories:
:* Workforce and Job Training;
:* Education;
:* Environmental Justice;
:* Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility (DEIA); and
:* Environment
EPRI's review of the CBPs found many categorical overlaps of CBP activities. For example, job training for community members with disabilities fits within the '''Workforce and Job Training''' and '''DEIA''' categories. Similarly, creating scholarships or internships for diverse college or university students satisfies both '''Education''' and '''DEIA'''.
Themes in CBP impact emerge as they are distilled down to the actionable activities. These themes do not necessarily align with the DOE's categories, but they are needed to create metrics for evaluating the efficacy of the proposed activities in the CBPs as these energy storage project develop. These themes can also help in developing measurable actions in future CBPs.
[[File:Summary EHS assessment by Tech.png | 500px | thumb | link=https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002016593 | Summary results of various energy storage technologies by EH&S Category for both normal operation and abnormal events.]]


=== Environmental Aspects of Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems ===
=== Environmental Aspects of Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems ===


[[File:Summary EHS assessment by Tech.png | 600px | thumb | link=https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002016593 | Summary results of various energy storage technologies by EH&S Category for both normal operation and abnormal events.]] The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EH&S) impacts of energy storage technologies need to be included in project planning. Understanding EH&S impacts during normal operation and abnormal events (e.g., failure scenarios) operation can help to inform siting location and system layout, determine what protective systems or equipment are needed on site, develop an effective emergency response plan, and more. EPRI has developed a framework for comparing the EH&S impacts associated with commercially-viable ESS technologies and continues to update the framework and analysis of various technologies as their commercial viability changes.
The [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002016593 Environmental, Health, and Safety (EH&S) impacts] of energy storage technologies need to be included in project planning. Understanding EH&S impacts during normal operation and abnormal events (e.g., failure scenarios) operation can help to inform siting location and system layout, determine what protective systems or equipment are needed on site, develop an effective emergency response plan, and more. EPRI has developed a framework for comparing the EH&S impacts associated with commercially-viable ESS technologies and continues to update the framework and analysis of various technologies as their commercial viability changes. EPRI will be revisiting this EH&S scorecard in 2024 to include a variety of advanced-lithium and non-lithium-based technologies.
 
=== Select Community Aspects of Energy Storage Resources ===
 
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
! Deliverable Title !! Product ID (with link) !! Year Published
|-
| Technology Innovation Spotlight: Lithium Ion Battery Fires in the News || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002028411 3002028411] || 2023
|-
| Cedartown Battery Energy Storage System Decommissioning Case Study || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002027944 3002027944] || 2023
|-
| Equity and Environmental Justice Aspects Across the Energy System || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002027134 3002027134] || 2023
|-
| Repowering Coal-Fired Power Plants for Battery Energy Storage || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002025591 3002025591] || 2023
|-
| Climate-Informed Planning and Adaptation for Power Sector Resilience || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002026317 3002026317] || 2023
|-
| Environmental Justice and Renewable Energy and Storage || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002024572 3002024572] || 2022
|-
| Equitable Decarbonization Research Roadmap || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002024030 3002024030] || 2022
|-
| Equity and Environmental Justice for a Clean Energy Transition || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002021206 3002021206] || 2021
|-
| Environmental Aspects of Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems || [https://www.epri.com/research/products/000000003002016593 3002016593] || 2020
|}


= [https://www.epri.com/about About EPRI] =
= [https://www.epri.com/about About EPRI] =

Latest revision as of 10:31, 19 March 2024

Deploying Storage in an Urban Space

Media coverage of hazardous incidents involving lithium ion batteries in electric vehicles, renewable energy storage, and consumer electronics has caused growing public concern of the safety of battery energy storage systems (BESS) installed in populated areas, especially in cities. The occurrence and reporting of these events underscores the need for continuous safety advances through technical due diligence, evolving codes, and coordinated education to contextually understand, mitigate, and communicate BESS hazards and consequences.

Founded in Palo Alto in 1972, EPRI is an independent non-profit energy research, development, and deployment organization with a foundational mission to benefit society. EPRI delivers independent, objective thought leadership and industry expertise to help the energy sector identify issues, technology gaps, and broader needs that can be addressed through effective, collaborative research and development programs. EPRI is an industry leader in energy storage safety and has developed many tools and resources to move the industry towards a safe, reliable, affordable, and clean energy storage future.

This page highlights EPRI's ongoing energy storage safety research program and provides links resources that support and inform decisions around safety of energy storage systems deployed in urban spaces.

EPRI's Energy Storage Safety Research

Fire Prevention and Mitigation for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)

Funding Partners Advisory Panel
Alliant Energy Excelon Southern Company CAC Specialty Hiller Fire
Arizona Public Service FM Global Salt River Project ESRG Jensen Hughes
Con Edison LADWP SMUD Exponent NREL
Duke Energy PG&E Synergy (Australia) NFPA PNNL
Enel RES TVA Hazard Dynamics UL
Eskom (South Africa) SCE HSE (UK) UT Austin

With a foundational mission to benefit society, EPRI delivers independent, objective thought leadership and industry expertise to the energy sector. EPRI’s portfolio in energy storage includes a collaborative, multi-phase project to understand and close gaps in energy storage safety and subsequent impacts. Our work brings together industry experts to generate new knowledge, identify best practices, and develop a safety toolkit. The research is made publicly available to advance the industry.

EPRI's Battery Energy Storage Fire Prevention and Mitigation project is in Phase 3. Initiated in 2021, Phase 1 of this project consolidated the experience of 15 utility members, 15 non-utility experts, and 10 energy storage site evaluations to identify gaps in safe design and operations of today’s ESS. Phase 2 created a lifecycle safety toolkit, including a retrofit guide, a codes and standards review, emergency response plan guidelines, and more. Moving forward, EPRI will use prior learnings and a new safety roadmap activity to prioritize and further extend the toolkit resources. Industry insights will be incorporated to guide utility owners, operators, and off-takers in their design, procurement, planning, and incident response.

FPaM Collab.png

Funding participants include 17 major utilities, project developers and insurance companies across the United States and world. The advisory team consists of diverse stakeholders such as National Labs, Fire Departments, fire safety experts, insurance agencies, and academic institutions.

To explore opportunities for collaboration and provide input in Phase 3 of the project, contact Storage-Safety@epri.com.

Failure Database 3-15.png


BESS Failure Event Database

Reviewing failures of urban installations may provide insights for improved safety and reliability. The database is a public resource for documenting publicly-available data on battery energy storage failure events from around the world. All information included is available in linked public documents that provide information such as system details, location, application, and a description of the failure event. To date, the database catalogs over 100 incidents in utility and commercial/industrial installations, electric transportation, recycling, manufacturing, and warehousing since 2011. EPRI has begun to dive deeper in assessing database statistics around root cause in an effort to measure and track safety and to see what other insights can be gained.

To submit or be notified of new entries, contact Storage-Safety@epri.com.

CRS.png

Carnegie Road ESS Failure Response, Recovery, and Rebuild Lessons Learned

In the early morning hours of September 15, 2020, an explosion occurred at the Carnegie Road energy storage site in the UK, followed by a fire that consumed one of three energy storage enclosures. This report conveys the lessons learned from the failure event, including aspects of emergency response, root cause investigation, and the redesign and rebuild process. The document conveys the general information about the failure event and the subsequent process to educate the industry and facilitate the development of best practices. The report highlights the need for clear communication around design features and failure event details, including the development of a post-incident plan.

Select Safety Resources

Deliverable Title Product ID (with link) Year Published
The Evolution of Battery Energy Storage Safety Codes and Standards 3002028521 2023
Safety Implications of Lithium Ion Chemistries 3002028522 2023
Carnegie Road ESS Failure Response, Recovery, and Rebuild Lessons Learned 3002026396 2023
Air Modeling Simulations of Battery Energy Storage System Fires 3002021777 2022
Difference Between Thermal Runaway and Fire Ignition of a Lithium Ion Battery 3002025283 2022
Battery Storage Fire Safety Roadmap 3002022540 2021
Lessons Learned: Lithium Ion Battery Storage Fire Prevention and Mitigation—2021 3002021208 2021
Battery Energy Storage Systems Explosion Hazards 3002022706 2021
Proactive First Responder Engagement for Battery Energy Storage System Owners and Operators 3002021774 2021

EPRI's Community Aspects of Energy Storage Research

Understanding the impacts of energy storage deployment on communities is critical for mitigating community- or public-driven memorandums and project cancellations. EPRI is an industry leader in how to consider and incorporate equity and environmental justice in energy projects. Regarding BESS, specifically, EPRI is developing guidance on community-based considerations that should be included in all phases of the project life cycle.

Lithium Ion Batteries in the news

Grid-scale BESS failure rates have decreased due to safety improvements, driven in part by increased regulation.

A theme throughout EPRI's work understanding the energy storage project impacts on communities and vice versa is the need for effective communication and public education and awareness that provides context for safety, equity, and environmental justice. The industry and regulatory requirements for electric vehicle and stationary energy storage system batteries are much more rigorous than those used in e-mobility devices, such as e-scooters and e-bikes that have caused or contributed to many fires throughout New York City over the past five years, some of which have resulted in death. EPRI did a review of grid-scale energy storage deployments and failure rates and found that large-scale BESS failure rates have decreased substantially since 2018 while cumulative capacity of deployed BESS has grown significantly.

Key takeaways from this study include:

  • While lithium ion battery fires have gained media attention, the technology’s overall safety record is

strong and continuously improving.

  • The likelihood and severity of fire and explosion associated with lithium ion batteries can be reduced through good design, which is already commonplace in batteries designed for electric vehicle (EV) and grid storage.
  • Batteries used in passenger electric vehicles and grid storage are subject to safety certification and testing that substantially reduce the frequency and severity of failures.
  • Micro-mobility products have exhibited higher rates of failure and failure intensity, most likely related to less mature quality control implementation, fewer regulatory safety protections, and common use of unapproved aftermarket components.

Large-format batteries used in passenger EVs and grid-scale storage are subject to certification and testing that reduce the frequency and severity of failures. Even with the rapid growth in deployments, failure incidents in these applications are infrequent. Regardless, failures are an avoidable tragedy, and the lessons learned must be applied to further reduce the possibility of future incidents. With proper installation and planning, failures that occur can be managed safely. Lessons learned from events have been applied to new storage facilities and are being integrated into building and fire codes and standards. In contrast, the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission reports suggest micro-mobility products require increased implementation of quality controls and certification to reduce the increasing frequency of failure incidents. Lithium ion battery safety is an ongoing focus area for research, regulatory development, and continuing education.

Community-Based Siting and Permitting for Grid-Scale Lithium Ion Battery Storage

As operational and proposed BESS facilities proliferate in the US and other countries, challenges to siting and permitting are emerging due to a combination of factors, some generic and others unique to battery energy storage technology. Large energy infrastructure projects generally face multi-agency reviews and the potential for community-based input and opposition. BESS-specific challenges revolve around the novelty of lithium ion battery technology and its environmental, health, and safety (EH&S) attributes. Of particular concern are the misinterpretation of news reports relating to fire safety and the broad availability of inaccurate and misleading information about observed failure events at utility-scale facilities. These messages are drawing a poor public perception of the technology, slowing energy storage adoption, and could have significantly delay the clean energy transition.

Utilities and energy storage developers need to manage the intersection of distinct developments that are occurring in the technology, market, and regulatory spaces. This can be challenging for understanding how to use energy storage and where to put it to meet electricity needs and ensure safety and environmental responsibility. EPRI has done a review of lithium ion BESS regulatory requirements across the country and is engaged with various energy storage project stakeholders to document their perspectives and experiences with siting and permitting. The intent is to provide insight and context to how energy storage is treated in different jurisdictions and provide guidance to utility planners, project developers, government agencies, jurisdictional authorities, the public, and other stakeholders on leading practices for engaging, communicating, and collaborating with each other to overcome BESS siting and permitting barriers and deliver benefits at the local, regional, national, and global levels.

Community Benefit Planning for Energy Storage Projects

EPRI is collating its collection of Community Benefits Plans (CBPs) for current and proposed energy storage projects that have been included in applications seeking federal support. CBP development is an opportunity for electric power companies to identify and make explicit the community benefits that projects would provide and include actionable activities within the project plan that improve the standing of communities that have been historically marginalized. The Department of Energy (DOE) requires CBPs to include actions that help to address one or more of the following categories:

  • Workforce and Job Training;
  • Education;
  • Environmental Justice;
  • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Accessibility (DEIA); and
  • Environment

EPRI's review of the CBPs found many categorical overlaps of CBP activities. For example, job training for community members with disabilities fits within the Workforce and Job Training and DEIA categories. Similarly, creating scholarships or internships for diverse college or university students satisfies both Education and DEIA.

Themes in CBP impact emerge as they are distilled down to the actionable activities. These themes do not necessarily align with the DOE's categories, but they are needed to create metrics for evaluating the efficacy of the proposed activities in the CBPs as these energy storage project develop. These themes can also help in developing measurable actions in future CBPs.

Summary results of various energy storage technologies by EH&S Category for both normal operation and abnormal events.

Environmental Aspects of Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems

The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EH&S) impacts of energy storage technologies need to be included in project planning. Understanding EH&S impacts during normal operation and abnormal events (e.g., failure scenarios) operation can help to inform siting location and system layout, determine what protective systems or equipment are needed on site, develop an effective emergency response plan, and more. EPRI has developed a framework for comparing the EH&S impacts associated with commercially-viable ESS technologies and continues to update the framework and analysis of various technologies as their commercial viability changes. EPRI will be revisiting this EH&S scorecard in 2024 to include a variety of advanced-lithium and non-lithium-based technologies.

Select Community Aspects of Energy Storage Resources

Deliverable Title Product ID (with link) Year Published
Technology Innovation Spotlight: Lithium Ion Battery Fires in the News 3002028411 2023
Cedartown Battery Energy Storage System Decommissioning Case Study 3002027944 2023
Equity and Environmental Justice Aspects Across the Energy System 3002027134 2023
Repowering Coal-Fired Power Plants for Battery Energy Storage 3002025591 2023
Climate-Informed Planning and Adaptation for Power Sector Resilience 3002026317 2023
Environmental Justice and Renewable Energy and Storage 3002024572 2022
Equitable Decarbonization Research Roadmap 3002024030 2022
Equity and Environmental Justice for a Clean Energy Transition 3002021206 2021
Environmental Aspects of Utility-Scale Energy Storage Systems 3002016593 2020

About EPRI

Together...Shaping the Future of Energy

With a foundational mission to benefit society, EPRI delivers independent, objective thought leadership and industry expertise to help the energy sector identify issues, technology gaps, and broader needs that can be addressed through effective, collaborative research and development programs.

Who We Are

Founded in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1972, EPRI is an independent non-profit energy research, development, and deployment organization, with three specialized labs. EPRI also maintains an employee presence in more than a dozen countries in Europe/Middle East/Africa, as well as Asia, and the Americas through its subsidiary EPRI International Inc. and its Ireland-based research arm, EPRI Europe DAC. EPRI's trusted experts collaborate with more than 450 companies in 45 countries, driving innovation to ensure the public has clean, safe, reliable, affordable, and equitable access to electricity across the globe.

Who We Work With

Rooted in science and rigor, EPRI collaborates with scientists, engineers, government, and experts from academia and industry to shape and drive technology advancement by pushing the frontier of innovation from concept, pilot, operation to end-of-life.

Our mission is accomplished by an extensive researcher network and a comprehensive advisory structure. Our portfolio of research programs is defined and guided by advisors from both industry and public stakeholders. More than 1,400 leaders and technical experts from the electricity sector, academia, and government help EPRI develop and conduct its research, deliver results, and provide for technology transfer and the application of research findings.

Our Membership

The institute's work is funded by hundreds of organizations around the world, including the energy sector, academia, and government. Organizations who engage in EPRI research, development, and demonstration programs have unique opportunities to:

  • Identify and solve critical and emerging industry issues.
  • Stay at the forefront of technology innovation.
  • Gain access to a comprehensive, timely RD&D portfolio.
  • Collaborate and network with industry peers through advisory councils and committees.
  • Implement technology through the support of our researchers and technical advisors.
  • Reduce future investment risks.
  • Inform policies with objective, science-based findings and facts.

Through their advisory roles in EPRI, its research sectors and programs, EPRI members help inform the development of EPRI's annual research portfolio, identify critical and emerging electricity industry issues, and support the application and technology transfer of EPRI's research and development.

EPRI is also the host of the World Energy Council's U.S. Member Committee. The committee brings together individuals, businesses, government, and collaborative organizations and institutions to accelerate the energy transformation and reliably meet critical net-zero climate goals. These goals will be achieved through unique collaborative events with the Council's global network to exchange value-oriented dialogue between energy and non-energy stakeholders, share best practices, and identify new collaborative opportunities.