Difference between revisions of "Performance and Reliability Foresight/SRP/Bolster"
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div align= | <div align=center style="border:0px solid black;width:100%;max-width:1500px;overflow-x:auto;height:auto;background-color: #EBEBEB;padding-top:15px;"> | ||
<iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/Cumulative_Energy/Cumulative_Energy_RTE.html" title="Bolster cumulative energy throughput and RTE for all available data." width=100% height=600px frameBorder=0></iframe> | <iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/Cumulative_Energy/Cumulative_Energy_RTE.html" title="Bolster cumulative energy throughput and RTE for all available data." width=100% height=600px frameBorder=0></iframe> | ||
<div align=center><b>Figure 2.</b> AC Cumulative charge and discharge energy for all available data. This figure should be updated daily as new data is received.</div> | <div align=center><b>Figure 2.</b> AC Cumulative charge and discharge energy for all available data. This figure should be updated daily as new data is received.</div> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
Figure 3 shows the half cycles grouped together. Hover over each charge / discharge group to see the round trip efficiency calculation and SoC Range details. | Figure 3 shows the half cycles grouped together. Hover over each charge / discharge group to see the round trip efficiency calculation and SoC Range details. | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div align= | <div align=center style="border:0px solid black;width:100%;max-width:1500px;overflow-x:auto;height:auto;background-color: #EBEBEB;padding-top:15px;"> | ||
<iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/RTE/RTE_Calculations.html" width=100% height=600px frameBorder=0></iframe> | <iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/RTE/RTE_Calculations.html" width=100% height=600px frameBorder=0></iframe> | ||
<div align=center><b>Figure 3.</b> A look at past charge and discharge half cycles which are grouped together to calculate RTE. This figure is not automatically updated and exists simply to demonstrate the half cycle grouping algorithm used to calculate RTE below. Please email Joe Thompson (jthompson@epri.com) to request a figure update.</div> | <div align=center><b>Figure 3.</b> A look at past charge and discharge half cycles which are grouped together to calculate RTE. This figure is not automatically updated and exists simply to demonstrate the half cycle grouping algorithm used to calculate RTE below. Please email Joe Thompson (jthompson@epri.com) to request a figure update.</div> | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div align= | <div align=center style="border:0px solid black;width:100%;max-width:1500px;overflow-x:auto;height:auto;background-color: #EBEBEB;padding-top:15px;"> | ||
<iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/RTE/RTE_vs_Time_Temp.html" width=100% height=600px frameBorder=0></iframe> | <iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/RTE/RTE_vs_Time_Temp.html" width=100% height=600px frameBorder=0></iframe> | ||
<div align=center><b>Figure 4.</b> The RTE events from Figure 3 shown vs time (left) and average ambient temperature (right). This figure should be updated daily as new data is received. Please email Joe Thompson (jthompson@epri.com) with any questions or to request a figure update.</div> | <div align=center><b>Figure 4.</b> The RTE events from Figure 3 shown vs time (left) and average ambient temperature (right). This figure should be updated daily as new data is received. Please email Joe Thompson (jthompson@epri.com) with any questions or to request a figure update.</div> | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<div align= | <div align=center style="border:0px solid black;width:100%;max-width:1500px;overflow-x:auto;height:auto;background-color: #EBEBEB;padding-top:15px;"> | ||
<iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/Unavailability/System_and_MP_Unavailability.html" title="Bolster system and megapack level unavailability analysis." width=100% height=750px frameBorder=0></iframe> | <iframe src="/resources/assets/Performance_Reliability_Foresight/Salt_River_Project/Unavailability/System_and_MP_Unavailability.html" title="Bolster system and megapack level unavailability analysis." width=100% height=750px frameBorder=0></iframe> | ||
<div align=center><b>Figure 5.</b> Unavailability analysis at the system and individual Megapack level.</div> | <div align=center><b>Figure 5.</b> Unavailability analysis at the system and individual Megapack level.</div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 11 October 2023
This page hosts all detailed analysis performed for the Bolster battery energy storage system.
Historical Operation
System Level
Megapack Level
Round Trip Efficiency (RTE)
For the Bolster system, RTE is being calculated in two ways:
- Continuously, using cumulative charge and discharge energy data
- Discretely, by focusing in on individual high-energy charge and discharge events
More details and results follow.
Cumulative RTE Calculations
Cumulative RTE calculations are derived by dividing the cumulative discharge energy profile by the cumulative charge energy profile. This provides a more practical view into energy losses associated with keeping the system operational, even when not in active use (charge or discharge). For this reason, this RTE calculation varies depending on the batteries use case. For example, a battery that is performing asset deferral (i.e. only discharges a few times per year) would generally have a lower cumulative RTE compared to an identical battery performing daily energy arbitrage. This is also why cumulative RTE is not well suited as a metric of comparison for different systems performing different duties.
Individual Event RTE Calculations
Calculating RTE from individual, dedicated reference performance cycles is a valuable technique for assessing and validating the system's specified round trip efficiency. A deep charge followed by an equally deep discharge at similar power levels can be used to calculate a systems RTE in a way that is typically more in line with the how vendors contractually specify round trip efficiencies. This method of RTE calculation provides results that are easier to compare across different system and technologies, though care must be taken to ensure an apt comparison.
Although the Bolster BESS is not yet performing regular reference performance test cycles, recent operation can provide a glimpse into its round trip efficiency (RTE). Because the system is performing repeated high energy charge & discharge half cycles it is possible to compare these events to get a sense of round trip efficiency. Note, special care must be taken when performing calculations as the half cycles often do not start and end at the same state of charge.
To arrive at these calculations the following steps are taken:
- A "half cycle detection" algorithm is applied to all historical State of Charge (SoC) and AC Power data.
- All identified charge and discharge half cycles are paired into groups
- For each group, a common SoC boundary is identified and the half cycles are windowed on these boundaries to ensure that the same SoC ranges are being compared
- The energy of each bounded half cycle is compared to calculate the RTE
Figure 3 shows the half cycles grouped together. Hover over each charge / discharge group to see the round trip efficiency calculation and SoC Range details.